First, let me say that J. Sheridan Le Fanu's Guy Deverell is not a classic. It is an entertaining Gothic novel.
Do you ever get confused and choose a non-classic when you mean to read a classic? I have a classics "slot" in my reading regimen: among the five or six books I may be reading at any one time are a "hot" new novel, an out-of-print women's novel or Virago, a genre book, a comedy, sometimes specifically a book by a male, and a classic (but this time Guy Deverell, a Gothic novel, ended up in the wrong slot).
When you are young you fall into books. In middle age you have less time, so you casually begin to read like a buyer at a bookstore: one-fourth of this bad ARC, one half of this mediocre one, and the whole of a very good book. The unevenness of new books will drive you mad, so you must have older books or classics going on the side.
Guy Deverell is amusing and suspenseful. The dialogue is sharp and often humorous. We don't know the secret of the mysterious Green Chamber. Although I'm not a mystery expert, Guy Deverell seems to be a predecessor of a locked-room mystery, though the room is not always locked, and the house party goes on for weeks, not a weekend.
Think if Agatha Christie went on for 400 pages!
The plot is engrossing but predictable; the characterization is Le Fanu's strength. The charming, bluff-talking Sir Jekyl meets a young man who is a "dead ringer" (no pun intended) for Guy Deverell, whom he killed in a duel many years ago. He learns that the young man's name is Guy Strangways, not Deverell, and he is accompanied by a Frenchman, M. Varberrierre, his uncle. Sir Jekyl thinks the two may be distant relatives trying to grab his inheritance, because he knows the name Strangways, and deviously he invites them to a house party (a little bit strange, yes?).
The Green Chamber at Sir Jekyl's mansion Marlowe becomes the focus. Both Sir Jekyl's wife and father begged on their deathbeds for the Green Chamber be walled up. He hasn't bothered. Instead, he insists that his friend the General and his beautiful wife Lady Jane must sleep there during their visit. Sir Jekyl's housekeeper, Donica, who slept in the Green Chamber for three years, quits over this arrangement because she is suspicious of Sir Jekyl.
So what is going on in the Green Chamber? Is there a ghost or a seducer? Isn't Lady Jane a gold digger? And why does M. Varberrierre insist on measuring the Green Room? Why does he warn Guy away from Sir Jekyll's daughter Beatrix?
The most vivid character is Lady Alice, the stepmother-in-law of Sir Jekyll, and the mother of Guy Deverell. She wants to protect Lady Jane when she hears from the housekeeper she is to stay in the Green Chamber. She locks Lady Jane in her room at night when the General goes to London, suspicious that Sir Jekyll may visit her.
I've read 300 pages and had fun...but really this is not as good as his best-known book, Uncle Silas, or The Rose and the Key, a Woman in White-ish book about an insane asylum... should I skip to the end?...but, no, I love Le Fanu, and am anyway compulsive with 100 pages left.
But it's not a classic, and I'll have to read something REALLY LONG AND DIFFICULT NOW.
CLEANING CLOSETS. Yes, I am a bad housewife. I sigh over it.
But I can clean a closet very quickly.
I have one of those 24-hour things. Oh, I can deal. I make my own vaporizer out of a bowl of hot water and a towel, drink spicy tea, and watch Downton Abbey.
Then I start feeling restless.
This is why. The bedroom is stuffy when the window is closed, and it occurs to me that all that stuff in the closet is dusty.
You know what I did?
Five garbage bags.
I bagged all those adorable clothes I used to wear and no longer fit into: a blue shirt with embroidered butterflies, green jeans from L. L. Bean, tiny gym shorts (how long was I able to wear those, I wonder), old sandals, a sweater from the Gap 1990, the tweed blazer the late R found for me at the Junior League charity store, the faded medium t-shirts (kept the Runcible Spoon one), ink-stained capris, a velvet dress (how cute!), a robe belt (where's the robe?), and two pairs of polar bear pajamas.
I also found a bag of stuff that belongs to a relative, who is doing moderately okay after a year in a nursing home. I hoped that she would gain weight and grow back into her fur-trimmed suede shirt and her too big matching knit pants and tops, but no, she has continued to shrink. She will never wear these again. And it makes me very sad.
Off to Good Will.
Saturday, December 01, 2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Too Polite?
Writers used to speculate about the consequences of the end of civility. Now they speculate about the consequences of the end of rudeness on the internet.
I first came across an odd complaint about the waning of rudeness on the internet in an article by Jason Silverman at Slate. He blamed social media for ruining literary criticism. Social media are not too rude, mind you. They are too polite. (Social media roughly seemed to be Twitter, blogs, and Facebook.)
Then the nonsequitur: If other people are too nice online, you can't be a literary critic at a newspaper.
Hmm. I didn't see that.
I didn't understand the relationship of polite social media to literary criticism, but soon The New York Times, the Man Booker Prize chairman, and The Guardian were repeating the argument.
And now Nathan Heller, a columnist at Slate, has written a piece for New York magazine in which he pines for the days when everybody was rude online.
These attacks on politeness online, all by male writers, express their perception that the pressure to be nice has bankrupted a few book review sections--surely not!--or at least wrecked their fun. They are annoyed by blandness.
I don't have Facebook or Twitter, so if there is too much blandness, I am missing out on it. And I am no doubt the blunt kind of person who would get "iced out of the nice conversation."
As a blogger, I am marginally part of the social media. Some bloggers are much more active socially. I enjoy reading blogs, but I don't usually read the comments, so I can't say whether they are too nice or not. The people who comment here are thoughtful and polite, but they say they find it difficult to access the publish comment button: one must type in a complicated code consisting of slanting, illegible letters and numbers to hit the Blogger "comment" button. Inevitably spammers can master the code.
If there is less rudeness online, that has to be good. Here's what I can tell you: the polite online communities last the longest. In the '90s, one of the online book groups I belonged to fell apart over Palestine--Edward Said's excellent autobiography, Out of Place, sparked a battle between one of our Jewish members and a radical pro-Palestine activisit. We begged them to stop talking about politics and move on, but alas! And another group split over responses to a book called Patty Jane's House of Curls. Yeah, I disliked that book. I never did have any tact.
Still, many of the Yahoo discussion groups, predecessors of social media, have longevitiy, due to excellent moderators. Ineresting, sometimes controversial, discussions take place, though occasionally a moderator comes on to say, "Be nice."
So perhaps these journalists will find what they're looking for if they get off the social media and join older traditional online discussion groups?
I first came across an odd complaint about the waning of rudeness on the internet in an article by Jason Silverman at Slate. He blamed social media for ruining literary criticism. Social media are not too rude, mind you. They are too polite. (Social media roughly seemed to be Twitter, blogs, and Facebook.)
Then the nonsequitur: If other people are too nice online, you can't be a literary critic at a newspaper.
Hmm. I didn't see that.
I didn't understand the relationship of polite social media to literary criticism, but soon The New York Times, the Man Booker Prize chairman, and The Guardian were repeating the argument.
And now Nathan Heller, a columnist at Slate, has written a piece for New York magazine in which he pines for the days when everybody was rude online.
"For those of us who learned to love the web best as a hostile, predatory, somewhat haunted place, this kindness is startling.... These days, life online has become friendly, well mannered, oversweet. Everyone is on his or her very best behavior—and if they’re not, they tend to be quickly iced out of the conversation."
These attacks on politeness online, all by male writers, express their perception that the pressure to be nice has bankrupted a few book review sections--surely not!--or at least wrecked their fun. They are annoyed by blandness.
I don't have Facebook or Twitter, so if there is too much blandness, I am missing out on it. And I am no doubt the blunt kind of person who would get "iced out of the nice conversation."
As a blogger, I am marginally part of the social media. Some bloggers are much more active socially. I enjoy reading blogs, but I don't usually read the comments, so I can't say whether they are too nice or not. The people who comment here are thoughtful and polite, but they say they find it difficult to access the publish comment button: one must type in a complicated code consisting of slanting, illegible letters and numbers to hit the Blogger "comment" button. Inevitably spammers can master the code.
If there is less rudeness online, that has to be good. Here's what I can tell you: the polite online communities last the longest. In the '90s, one of the online book groups I belonged to fell apart over Palestine--Edward Said's excellent autobiography, Out of Place, sparked a battle between one of our Jewish members and a radical pro-Palestine activisit. We begged them to stop talking about politics and move on, but alas! And another group split over responses to a book called Patty Jane's House of Curls. Yeah, I disliked that book. I never did have any tact.
Still, many of the Yahoo discussion groups, predecessors of social media, have longevitiy, due to excellent moderators. Ineresting, sometimes controversial, discussions take place, though occasionally a moderator comes on to say, "Be nice."
So perhaps these journalists will find what they're looking for if they get off the social media and join older traditional online discussion groups?
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The Male Author Count: Books by Nick Hornby and Terry Pratchett Again!
I read mostly books by women. It's no secret. Maybe 72 percent of the books I read are by women.
When I read Hemingway, I'd rather be reading Margaret Drabble or Hortense Calisher.
But the year is ending, and I'm trying to get my Male Author Count up. That sounds vaguely like sperm count, but isn't.
Elainee is one of those journalists who cross the line. Everything becomes fodder for a column. The good and the bad personal stuff is entwined even with serious examination of other subjects.
Dodger? The Artful Dodger, right? No, they are not the same character. Pratchett's Dodger is a "tosher," a scavenger who mines the sewers for coins and treasure, while the Artful Dodger in Oliver Twist is a thief. Dodger makes a good living, and more money than a chimney sweep, though he doesn't like to say how well he does. He lives in an apartment with Solomon, a Jewish mentor who insists on good hygiene.
When I read Hemingway, I'd rather be reading Margaret Drabble or Hortense Calisher.
But the year is ending, and I'm trying to get my Male Author Count up. That sounds vaguely like sperm count, but isn't.
I recently finished Hornby's A Long Way Down, a poignant, funny novel in which four suicidal people meet on a roof on New Year's Eve.
Since I'm in the mood for comedy, I'm also rereading Hornby's Juliet, Naked, another novel hard to classify. An incompatible couple is undone by the man's rock fandom, and his female companion wants out, tired of his nutty website about a retired rocker.
It begins when Charlie, a banker, and his wife, Elaine, a journalist, decide to get a divorce. Their mode of separation is no longer viable: Charlie lives in a flat during the week, but spends weekends with Elaine and the kids. Even the kids think the parents should get divorced.
After talking about it, Charlie walks away feeling as though he has been hit by a sniper's bullet.
And then Elaine writes a newspaper column, "Bastard," about him. Suddenly everyone knows all about her "Life with My Ex."
And then Elaine writes a newspaper column, "Bastard," about him. Suddenly everyone knows all about her "Life with My Ex."
"Exactly a week later, when Charlie discovered that he had become known--to hundreds of thousands of people who still bought newspapers, and God knows how many more who didn't but who read them anyway--as somebody called Bastard, it all began to make sense."
Elainee is one of those journalists who cross the line. Everything becomes fodder for a column. The good and the bad personal stuff is entwined even with serious examination of other subjects.
So Charlie's life is pretty much ruined. Everyone knows all of Charlie's foibles and his social life becomes impossible. Charlie, like his predecessor, Martin, in A Long Way Down, is stuck. Who will ever think well of him again?
The ending is abrupt, but I very much enjoyed this story, which is structured like a novella. Probably in a novel we would get Elaine's point of view, too.
TERRY PRATCHETT'S DODGER is a Dickensian Y.A. book, and adult fans of Dickens are likely to enjoy it. It is fast-paced, witty, and rambunctiously plot-driven, laced with allusions to Oliver Twist, Our Mutual Friend, and Bleak House. Although the structure is simpler than that of Dickens-inspired novels like Dan Simmons's rambling Drood--hence the Y.A. category--it is more entertaining.
Dodger? The Artful Dodger, right? No, they are not the same character. Pratchett's Dodger is a "tosher," a scavenger who mines the sewers for coins and treasure, while the Artful Dodger in Oliver Twist is a thief. Dodger makes a good living, and more money than a chimney sweep, though he doesn't like to say how well he does. He lives in an apartment with Solomon, a Jewish mentor who insists on good hygiene.
Dodger is a hero. He saves a young woman from her kidnappers, and this incident is the crux of the novel. She tumbles out of a coach, and the men are instantly after her. With brass knuckles, wit, and skill, Dodger hammers the two men. They run away.
Soon Dodger and the girl are joined by Charlie Dickens and Henry Mayhew (the author of London Labour and the London Poor, a 19th century study of work), who happen to be on a walk. They hide the girl, nicknamed Simplicity, in Henry's house.
And Dodger becomes even more heroic. He tries to find the coach, which he noticed had a squeaky wheel, stops a robbery at Charlie's newspaper, and catches the mad barber, Sweeney Todd.
Fans of Pratchett's Discworld books will be fascinated by parallels between the Victorian London of Dodger and the fantastic Discworld city Ankh-Morpork. Again, if you're one of those people who reads all Dickens-inspired books, as I am, you'll probably enjoy this. It would need a little tweaking to appear in the adult literature section, but, like all Pratchett's books, it is very well-written.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Book Traffic: Twelve Books to Give for Christmas
![]() |
| The best new book this year. |
I didn't shop on Gray Thursday or Black Friday. It's not that I am pious, but why give those corporations all your money? I saw the ad for a $59 Nook and was tempted to rush out and buy one. But I don't need a $59 Nook. I have an old Nook, which works fine. Last year I gave my husband a Nook which works fine, too, though not as well as my really old Nook.
Why buy all that electronic crap and contribute to the world's trash?
This year I'm giving everyone a book. ONE book. It will be like World Book Night, except I'll give different books. I am not going to be cute and flutter around shopping the day before Christmas. It isn't cute. And usually I buy gifts no one much cares for anyway. An organic watch got ruined last year when somebody washed the dishes wearing it. I was the one who wanted the organic watch.
I have already pored over The Best Books of the Year lists at The Washington Post, Publishers' Weekly, The Guardian, and The Spectator. They look very good, but I am going to add a list of more good books, if you want something a little different... Well, here goes.
1. Break of Day by Colette. An exquisite, witty, lyrical novel written by Colette in her fifties about retirement from sexual love. Published in 1928, it perfectly traces the resolve of middle-aged Colette to set aside sexual love for solitude.
2. The Life in the Studio by Nancy Hale. This out-of-print novelist and memoirist was the daughter of painters Lilian Westcott Hale and Philip L. Hale. Some think this was her masterpiece. This memoir was inspired by relics in her mother's studio, which Nancy cleaned out after her mother's death.
3. The Post-Office Girl by Stefan Zweig. A dark Cinderella story by an Austrian Jewish writer who wrote several stunning novellas and novels and fled the Nazis to Brazil.
4. Twilight of Love: Travels with Turgenev by Robert Dessaix. In this short book, Dessaix retraces Turgenev’s footsteps in Europe, and meditates on his own relationship with Russian literature. He also compares his Australian identity to the “barbaric” Russian identity of Turgenev in the 19th century (both places were said to have “no culture,” and travel to Europe was necessary for intellectual development).
5. The Watch by Joydeep Roy-Bhattacharya. A retelling of Antigone set during the war in Afghanistan, this complex novel about a woman amputee and American soldiers is my favorite new novel of the year. Give this book with a copy of Sophocles' Antigone.
6. The Red House by Mark Haddon. A novel about a difficult family vacation. Richard, a doctor, has invited his sister, Angela, an inner-city school teacher, and her family for a week’s vacation on the Welsh border near Hay-on-Wye.
7. The Night Train by Clyde Edgerton. Inspired by James Brown, Civil Rights, and friendship, this charming novel is the deceptively simple story of a music-based interracial friendship between two boys who work in a furniture-refinishing shop. One of the best books I read this year.
8. The Sweetest Dream by Doris Lessing, an extraordinary novel about idealism and disillusion in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s.
9. Lucy Gayheart by Willa Cather. Divided into three parts, this brilliant novel vividly chronicles the brief life of Lucy, a graceful young woman and piano student who suffers a terrible loss in Chicago and then is lost herself in Nebraska.
10. Zoo Time by Howard Jacobson. A satire of the publishing world. One of the funniest books I read this year.
11. A Lovesong for India by Ruth Prawer Jhabvala. A collection of short stories by the Booker Prize winning author of Heat and Dust.
12. The Truth by Terry Pratchett. A great satire of journalism, set in Pratchett's fictional fantastical city of Ankh-Pork, where William de Worde starts a newspaper after dwarves invent a printing press.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Books That Get You through the Holidays: Olivia Manning's The Doves of Venus
The turkey was dry and overcooked. That was okay, because I don't have much vested in cooking. But it happened because the old guys returned late from a community center one illicitly has the key to.
I opened a jar of gravy.
Over pie a drunken friend recited Hart Crane's "The Bridge," the subject of her dissertation, until given an alcohol-free Martini, which she thought had alcohol in it. Then there was some listening to the Beatles and Wynton Marsalis. Then there was Charades, and someone did "Fifty Shades of Grey," and, yeah, I guessed it.
Then our friend Natalie burst into tears, because her evil ex- stole her car, which is, yeah, his officially, but he zooms around in an SUV, and she needed the old Chevy to get to Walmart to work the graveyard shift. Usually she can cope with him, but somehow...The holiday? Anyway, we called to say we'd put it up on our Facebook page if he didn't give the car back so she could work Grey Thursday.
Well, that was a blatant lie because we don't have a Facebook page.
What counter-culture person has a Facebook page?
I have been very tired the last couple of days. I slept till ten Friday and Saturday. Then I took a hike on a hilly trail in the wrong pair of shoes and limped back to a picnic table to wait for a ride--the first time I've ever broken down on a walk.
So reading and more reading was the answer.
Olivia Manning's The Doves of Venus is a gorgeously-written, exuberant novel about what it meant to be female in the mid-twentieth century. It traces the career of Ellie, a young woman who leaves her home in Eastsea for London, where she finds a job painting and "antiquing" Regency furniture. She doesn't mind living in a tiny room, and is utterly intoxicated by her unfaithful lover, Quintin, the middle-aged man who seduced her and got her the promotion to work in the studio.
Parallel to the narrative of Ellie, and possibly more interesting, though much less developed, is the sketch of Petta, Quintin's wife, a suicidal drifting former beauty. She is living with Theo, a tabloid journalist, and Quintin doesn't expect to hear from her. But a stranger calls Quintin in the middle of the night to say he has talked Petta down from jumping off the parapet of Westminster Bridge. Quintin is stuck with Petta, because there is nowhere for her to go.
Manning's descriptions are incomparable. Here is Quintin looking at Petta after her suicide attempt.
"Under the ghastly violet-white of the fluorescent strips, Petta had the pallor of the unliving....Petta is an unsympathetic character, and yet haven't we women all been there? Why should she/we be compared with girls of 18? Why should she not be upset and sneery? She is upset at a party by the younger generation, who are sensible and conventional, not chic and nonchalant, as she and her friends were in the aftermath of World War II. When she sees her daughter from her first marriage, Flora, she is envious that Flora plans to be a doctor, bypassing the dependence of the beautiful woman.
"She gave him a quick, uncertain glance, then, making a movement coquettish and pathetic, turned away. She had been crying. Looking down on her head, he noticed in the filmy fairness of her hair a sort of dusting of gray hairs. Her whole appearance had taken on a kind of lifeless dryness as though, during the months she had been away, she had been pressed colourless like a flower in a book."
But most of this charming novel is not about Petta. Manning describes Ellie's struggles with genteel poverty, her work, and her exhilaration with the sights of London. She also vividly delineates Ellie's friendship with Nancy, an artist in the studio who is also poor. We see the girls giggling together, floundering, yet invincible, determined not to go back to the provinces. And when they visit Nancy's uncle, Tom Claypole, a wealthy old man, for a weekend, they love the food and warmth, so different from their experience in London. But Nancy uses Ellie to distract him from Maxine, a former friend who is trying to usurp Nancy's place in Tom's will.
Manning (1908-1980) is best known for The Balkan Trilogy and The Levant Trilogy, autobiographical novels about her experiences during World War II in Bucharest, Greece, Cairo, and Germany.
The voices of the women in The Doves of Venus are pitch-perfect, and this is one of the best "middlebrow" novels I've read this year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












